Analysis
Who
Is a Journalist?
Some Surprising Answers
By Tom Rosenstiel |
 |
Monday, July 26, 2004 -As the nations press descends on Boston
for the Democratic Convention, the Democrats face an old problem: Who is and who
isnt a journalist?
Officially, the Democrats decide on press credentials: which scribes, bloggers,
on-air correspondents and off-air producers and camera crews should have access
to the action. Implicit is deciding what constitutes journalism and who is and
isnt practicing it.
The First Amendment might seem to promise something akin to absolute freedom
for the press, but the reality isnt so simple. And its getting more
complicated.
When President George W. Bushs father was president just 12 years ago,
you had to be hired by a company that owned a printing press or held a license
to broadcast television or radio to prove you were a journalist.
No more. Now anyone with a Web site can publish and write. As the number of
outlets expands, so have the standards and styles of the press.
Is someone from E-Entertainment a journalist? Is Bill OReilly, or is
he a political propagandist? What about Al Franken, Rush Limbaugh or Michael Moore?
There are moments in Fahrenheit 911 where Moore seems to behave as
if he were one. At other times, he is a celebrity and still at others, a satirist.
This year the Democrats expanded the accreditation rolls to include bloggers
-- the current term for people who write personal Web columns, some of whom may
consider themselves journalists, some of whom may not.
My colleague Bill Kovach and I have spent a number of years thinking about
what constitutes a journalist and journalism.We have some answers that may surprise
you.
The proper question isnt whether someone calls himself or herself a journalist.
Anyone can be a journalist and some may be, whether they like it or not.
The question is whether their work constitutes journalism. As Phil Donahue
told us once, the guy who walked into the bar at Chernobyl at that moment was
doing journalism. Many folks who insist they arent journalists may have
assumed the responsibilities and legal burdens of the press if the work they do
amounts to journalism. In the end, the public, not the practitioner, decides.
So what constitutes journalism?
-- A journalist is someone who tries above all to tell the literal truth, to
get the facts right, doesnt pass along rumors, engages in verifying and
makes that process of verification as transparent as possible.
-- A journalists goal is to inspire public discussion, not to help one
side win or another lose. The latter is an activist.
-- Neutrality is not a core principle of journalism. But the commitment to
facts, to public consideration and to independence from faction, are.
-- A journalist is someone whose loyalty to his or her audience, even above
employer, is paramount.
There are other principles of journalism, but these are the key ones for people
to consider as they watch the two tribes -- the political press and the professional
political class -- gather this week.
The event also is a reminder of another principle of the press: Journalism
evolved out of the Enlightenment principally to help people self govern. When
people became sovereign, they needed more information to judge leaders and public
events. About 40 years after the first newspapers were born, the term public opinion
was first used.
There is one other implication of all this. The quality of our journalism and
our democracy, as Joseph Pulitzer noted nearly a century ago, will rise and fall
together.
---
Tom Rosenstiel is director
of the Project for Excellence in Journalism and vice chair of the Comittee of
Concerned Journalists
|